The Use of Ketamine Sedation for the Treatment of Nail Bed Repairs in the Paediatric Emergency Department

Aim: To determine if ketamine sedation is a safe and cost-effective way of treating paediatric patients presenting with nail bed injuries to the emergency department. Method:Aretrospective cohort study was carried out over a nine-month period in children between ages 18 months and 16 years old, presenting to the paediatric emergency department (PED) at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, with nail bed injuries requiring repair by the plastic surgery team. The primary outcome measures are complications at the time of sedation and at outpatient follow up including surgical site infection at seven days. A secondary outcome measure of parental satisfaction was collected at four months. A cost analysis comparison against procedures completed under general anaesthetic was also undertaken. Results: During the 9-month period, 10 nail bed repairs were performed under ketamine sedation in the PED. There were no serious adverse events recorded. No cases required further procedures and there were no cases of surgical site infections at 7 days. Parents reported favourable outcomes, with an average overall satisfaction score of 9.4 (where 10 is complete satisfaction). At follow up, there was one recorded complication which was successfully treated, with all patients being discharged from follow up within 3 months. Conclusion: This small study has shown ketamine procedural sedation in the paediatric population to be a safe and cost-effective method for the treatment of nail bed injuries in children presenting to PED. We believe that this management strategy, brought to the fore during the COVID-19 pandemic, should be considered as standard across all PEDs.

Accessibility and applicability of physical activity guidelines and recommendations for adults living with long term conditions during COVID-19.

To review the applicability and accessibility of physical activity guidelines for adults living with long-term conditions whilst shielding during the COVID-19. A narrative review with systematic methodology was conducted between 2015 and 2021, with two stages: 1) Search of electronic databases PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Cinahl; 2) search of long-term condition organisations. Sixty-five articles were identified, where nine included specific guidelines during the COVID-19, 28 specific guidelines to individuals living with long-term conditions and 7 identified the utilization of online resources. Twenty-one long-term condition organizations websites were reviewed where all of them included a section regarding physical activity guidelines and seven referred to online and offline accessible resources during COVID-19. Accessibility and applicability were variable across academic databases and long-term conditions organisation websites. Findings could inform long-term condition policy and guidelines development to better and more relevant support people living with long-term conditions to be physically active.

Delivering quality improvement coaching in a virtual world: the use of digital technology to empower and engage CFDigiCare clinicians to undertake quality improvement activities nationally

Background: CFDigiCare is a community of practice using digital adherence data, FEV1 and BMI to inform clinical decision-making and comprehensive digital behaviour change tools to support patient self-care. The 16 UK adult CF centres that form CFDigiCare work together using improvement science to embed digital data into routine care. The collaborative uses the Dartmouth Microsystems approach to build quality improvement (QI) capability Most CFDigiCare teams attended a one-day class-based QI training pre-COVID-19, with subsequent coaching delivered online. We discuss digital QI refresher training and coaching to the nationally dispersed improvement collaborative during the COVID crisis. Methods: 1-hour QI refresher training was delivered via MS Teams. Dartmouth improvement ramp activities were undertaken during subsequent 3 sessions. Results: Average attendance was 9. We explored two areas for improvement, teams participated in group ‘Fishbone’ exercises, silent brainstorming, discussed change ideas and planned PDSA cycles. Staff rated the meetings 9.4/10, commenting: • Useful QI demonstration and collaboration of ideas • Jamboard is a useful tool for gathering ideas • Can deliver it to the team • Good feedback for PDSAs Attendance was high with staff valuing practical interactive sessions using facilitated MS Teams calls and tools such as Google Jamboard. Virtual sessions connected clinicians from 16 centres providing a national “hive brain” perspective on system optimisation. The Dartmouth microsystems paradigm focused attention on specific aims, providing a structure to deliver iterative change. Virtual connectivity allowed QI to continue despite COVID-19. Familiarity with MS Teams increased over time with shared mastery of the technology a clear improvement outcome. Conclusion: Digital technology not only supports the delivery of QI training and coaching but can enhance it;clinical teams quickly mastered platforms such as MS Teams and Google Jamboard.